Hao Xu Posted August 1 Share Posted August 1 您是否仍可以使用此站点来创建 Windows CSP 策略,或者您是否已切换到其他站点? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Employee Siddesh Raj Patil Posted August 1 Employee Share Posted August 1 Hi Hao, What policy are you trying to configure ? Regards, Siddesh Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas TERRIEN Posted August 1 Share Posted August 1 Why don't you create a "Windows (beta)" profile ? It does the same as PolicyBulider, but better and integrated in WS1 😉 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Employee Solution Dylan Babcock Posted August 2 Employee Solution Share Posted August 2 On 8/1/2024 at 4:48 AM, Thomas TERRIEN said: Why don't you create a "Windows (beta)" profile ? It does the same as PolicyBulider, but better and integrated in WS1 😉 Agreed, this is the way it should be done. I think Policy Builder will not be updated in the future in favor of the Windows (Beta) platform type which has the same CSP's that Policy Builder does. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas TERRIEN Posted August 5 Share Posted August 5 On 8/2/2024 at 8:12 PM, Dylan Babcock said: Agreed, this is the way it should be done. I think Policy Builder will not be updated in the future in favor of the Windows (Beta) platform type which has the same CSP's that Policy Builder does. BTW it would be cool if Omnissa could add all the ADMX_xxx Policy CSPs 😉 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Employee Dylan Babcock Posted August 5 Employee Share Posted August 5 @Thomas TERRIEN Curious, is there a specific ADMX_xxx policy you're looking to implement? Baselines are still a thing if you want to implement any GPO's that aren't available via Policy CSP yet, but just curious to see an example. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas TERRIEN Posted August 5 Share Posted August 5 17 minutes ago, Dylan Babcock said: @Thomas TERRIEN Curious, is there a specific ADMX_xxx policy you're looking to implement? Baselines are still a thing if you want to implement any GPO's that aren't available via Policy CSP yet, but just curious to see an example. ADMX_Power for instance, but it depends on what my clients are asking for 😄 I'm quite fluent in SyncML but some of my clients can be skeptical when I explain how to build custom profiles from scratch ! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Employee Dylan Babcock Posted August 5 Employee Share Posted August 5 1 hour ago, Thomas TERRIEN said: ADMX_Power for instance, but it depends on what my clients are asking for 😄 I'm quite fluent in SyncML but some of my clients can be skeptical when I explain how to build custom profiles from scratch ! Understood. At this point, I think the proper path forward is to submit that as an idea at https://wsone.ideas.aha.io/?category=6787856840400996014. I appreciate you sharing the example. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edwin Posted August 6 Share Posted August 6 try the tool my coworker "Workspace Wannes" build: WS1 ADMX profile builder - WorkspaceWannes Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eg2428 Posted August 12 Share Posted August 12 On 8/5/2024 at 8:20 AM, Dylan Babcock said: @Thomas TERRIEN Curious, is there a specific ADMX_xxx policy you're looking to implement? Baselines are still a thing if you want to implement any GPO's that aren't available via Policy CSP yet, but just curious to see an example. I'd like to create an account using the Accounts CSP: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/client-management/mdm/accounts-csp But the option is unavailable through a Windows (Beta) profile: Additionally, the Firewall CSP has a lot of fields with identical names, making it very difficult to figure out what applies to what. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MichaelZ Posted August 13 Share Posted August 13 (edited) I found the beta profiles to be useable for the most basic tasks at best. The policybuilder was such a great tool that saved tons of time. I really hope you bring it back. The ADMX editor is blocked by Windows from running on our pcs. Got it to work however not all options are available in the ADMX which again makes the policybuilder a far superior tool. For example in the wirelessdisply admx only 2 of the options are available while the policybuilder had all of them AllowMdnsAdvertisement AllowMdnsDiscovery AllowMovementDetectionOnInfrastructure AllowPCReceiverToBeTCPServer AllowPCSenderToBeTCPClient AllowProjectionFromPC AllowProjectionFromPCOverInfrastructure AllowProjectionToPC AllowProjectionToPCOverInfrastructure AllowUserInputFromWirelessDisplayReceiver RequirePinForPairing Edited August 13 by MichaelZ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MichaelZ Posted August 13 Share Posted August 13 On 8/2/2024 at 8:12 PM, Dylan Babcock said: Agreed, this is the way it should be done. I think Policy Builder will not be updated in the future in favor of the Windows (Beta) platform type which has the same CSP's that Policy Builder does. Unfortunately we are not in a position where we can use beta profiles that may or may not work as expected in our production environment. For example, we have spent days if not weeks trying to get the encryption template to work without any success. 2 minutes in policybuilder and a custom profile and everything worked. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.